<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That argument again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/</link>
	<description>Anaerobe Thighs Tony Won</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 03:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tama_Boyle</title>
		<link>http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator>Tama_Boyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statehighwayone.com/?p=1456#comment-1356</guid>
		<description>I think this guy (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.essentialsolutions.co.nz/Free-Will-Kit.html)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.essentialsolutions.co.nz/Free-Will-Kit...&lt;/a&gt; this reputable enough for me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this guy (<a href="http://www.essentialsolutions.co.nz/Free-Will-Kit.html)" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.essentialsolutions.co.nz/Free-Will-Kit.." rel="nofollow">http://www.essentialsolutions.co.nz/Free-Will-Kit..</a>. this reputable enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin english</title>
		<link>http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>martin english</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statehighwayone.com/?p=1456#comment-1355</guid>
		<description>Be very careful when playing with sophistry like this.  
 
It reminds me of the situation that the Quirmian philosopher Ventre found himself in.  His position was &quot;Possibly the gods exist, and possibly they do not. So why not believe in them in any case? If it&#039;s all true you&#039;ll go to a lovely place when you die, and if it isn&#039;t then you&#039;ve lost nothing, right?&quot; When he died he woke up in a circle of gods holding nasty-looking sticks and one of them said, &quot;We&#039;re going to show you what we think of Mr Clever Dick in these parts...&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be very careful when playing with sophistry like this.  </p>
<p>It reminds me of the situation that the Quirmian philosopher Ventre found himself in.  His position was &quot;Possibly the gods exist, and possibly they do not. So why not believe in them in any case? If it&#039;s all true you&#039;ll go to a lovely place when you die, and if it isn&#039;t then you&#039;ve lost nothing, right?&quot; When he died he woke up in a circle of gods holding nasty-looking sticks and one of them said, &quot;We&#039;re going to show you what we think of Mr Clever Dick in these parts&#8230;&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator>The Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 03:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statehighwayone.com/?p=1456#comment-1353</guid>
		<description>Anyone who doesn&#039;t realise that this argument amounts to little more than a philosopher circle-jerk should stay well away from the &quot;discussion&quot; (a discussion which in fact generally amounts to a series of monologues). 
 
What is the conclusion of the argument? No change, just more talk. Forever. Nothing else is possible with philosophers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who doesn&#039;t realise that this argument amounts to little more than a philosopher circle-jerk should stay well away from the &quot;discussion&quot; (a discussion which in fact generally amounts to a series of monologues). </p>
<p>What is the conclusion of the argument? No change, just more talk. Forever. Nothing else is possible with philosophers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RyanSproull</title>
		<link>http://www.statehighwayone.com/2010/01/that-argument-again/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>RyanSproull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 14:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.statehighwayone.com/?p=1456#comment-1354</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, well, that depends on what you mean by &quot;discussion&quot;. And &quot;conclusion&quot;. And &quot;and&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, well, that depends on what you mean by &quot;discussion&quot;. And &quot;conclusion&quot;. And &quot;and&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
